A Nigerian and YouTuber, Tiamiyu Emdee, is an international student that just arrived in the United Kingdom (UK) in nothing less than eight months. He had granted an interview with the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) to allege that students’ visa is a fraudulent way of migration and this is why the population has risen, exponentially.
Following his interview, the UK Home Office, set out packages that remove the right for international students to bring dependants unless they are on postgraduate courses currently designated as research programmes; remove the ability for international students to switch out of the student route into work routes before their studies have been completed; review the maintenance requirements for students and dependants; decided to take steps to clamp down on unscrupulous education agents who may be supporting inappropriate applications to sell immigration not education; better communicating immigration rules to the higher education sector and to international students and improved and more targeted enforcement activity.
Reactions of the UK Home Office based on the interview of Emdee generated a lot of mixed controversies with some social media users saying his interview was not the cause of the UK Home Office action, many attributed it to him.
Emdee, who happens to be a YouTuber, doing videos on scholarships, had also released another video on his channel to apologise, stating his intention for saying such was misunderstood.
However, in light of the UK Home Office action, an organisation that supports the UK’s Universities by campaigning for conditions that help increase their impact locally, nationally and globally, headed by Jamie Arrowsmith has pleaded the Home Office on behalf of the international students to reconcile its decision on banning the conversion of students’ route to work.
In a statement published on its website, Arrowsmith wrote about the economic importance of the international students and how they’ve immensely contributed to the growth of the UK economy, “with a single cohort delivering a total benefit of £41.9 billion,” he wrote, “since 2019.”
He decried the rise of the dependants in the UK leading to the rise in population nearly beyond the capacity of the country but highlighted that rather banning the students from bringing in dependants, “We therefore urge the government to work with the sector to limit and monitor the impact on particular groups of students – and on universities, which are already under serious financial pressures. The review process that has been announced must consider these issues.”
Related Posts
The statement reads:
In response to the written ministerial statement issued a short time ago by the Home Office, Jamie Arrowsmith, Director of Universities UK International, said:
“International students make an invaluable contribution to our universities and to the UK’s economy. Building on the government’s explicit commitments and ambitions, which were clearly set out in the International Education Strategy, we have seen significant growth since 2019. Our research shows that international students make a huge economic contribution to the UK, with a single cohort delivering a total benefit of £41.9 billion. We also know that the public are overwhelmingly supportive of the international students we attract – just 9% of people think we should be discouraging international students from choosing the UK.
“Today’s announcement provides some clarity for students and universities after many months of rumour and speculation, but leaves some questions unanswered. The government has reaffirmed its commitment to sustainable growth and to the ambitions set out in the International Education Strategy. Confirmation that the Graduate route will remain open and competitive is critically important. Meaning that international students can remain in the UK and work for up to two or three years after completing their studies, gaining experience and helping to address critical skills shortages.
“The rise in the number of dependent visas has been substantial and has likely exceeded planning assumptions in government. We recognise that, in some places, this has led to local challenges around access to suitable family accommodation and schooling, with implications for the student experience. Given this, some targeted measures to mitigate this rise may be reasonable, for example looking at eligibility for particular types of course (such as one-year taught postgraduate programmes) or enhancing the financial assurances that prospective students are required to provide.
“While the vast majority of students will be unaffected by proposals that limit the ability to be accompanied by dependents, more information is needed on the programmes that are in scope before a proper assessment of the impact can be made. Yet we do know that any changes are likely to have a disproportionate impact on women and students from certain countries. We therefore urge the government to work with the sector to limit and monitor the impact on particular groups of students – and on universities, which are already under serious financial pressures. The review process that has been announced must consider these issues.
“Ultimately, our collective aim must be to ensure that international students who choose the UK can be confident that they are welcome here, that their contribution is valued, and that the terms on which they have made decisions remain stable. Anything that threatens to affect the UK’s global success as a top destination for international talent needs to be considered very carefully.”
Enoch Oyedibu
I am a fanatic of community development who only knows how to do it through INVESTIGATIONS of hidden crimes. Got a story, check Contact Us.
